How Do You Choose a Medical Malpractice Lawyer in New York?

How do you decide which attorney is right for you? If you've never hired an attorney before, you won't know until you're in the thick of it. Here's information you need to know to make you a better informed consumer.

Are you more likely right than wrong? Proving a medical malpractice case in New York

When you bring a civil lawsuit in New York, the burden of proof is on us to prove your case at a trial. What exactly is the “burden of proof?” It is that level of proof that is known as the “preponderance of evidence.” Well what exactly does that mean?

Filing Complaints against Hospitals: How to Be an Effective Advocate

Many hospitals consistently provide quality care to their patients, but there are always instances where certain individuals don’t receive the professional attention they deserve. This is to be expected in any business, but in hospitals, the consequences can be more serious and could lead to life-threatening situations. Hospitals also present more difficulty because patients are not always in a sufficiently stable mental or physical state to be their own care quality advocates. The following are steps to be taken by patients or their family members and should serve as a guide to proceeding through the proper channels to achieve fast and effective results.

NY Medical Malpractice lawyer has solution for medical malpractice

Have you ever wondered why there's so much friction between lawyers and doctors? Doctors don't like lawyers, believing that we are evil and only look to sue undeserving doctors. Lawyers believe there are doctors in practice who are truly harming patients. The friction can be palpable. One smart lawyer has the answer that will solve the problem...

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE IN NEW YORK; FACTS AND TRENDS

FACT: Patients sue doctors and hospitals. They’re unhappy with the outcome of a procedure; they’re upset because a doctor misdiagnosed their condition and now they have a permanent injury or disability. That’s a fact. However, the facts and trends show an entirely different story. Fact: Most victims of medical malpractice in NY don’t even know they’ve been a victim of improper medical care because nobody tells them.

HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF A DOCTOR SAY "I'M NOT GOING TO ORDER A TEST OR PROCEDURE, BECAUSE IT COSTS TOO MUCH?

When two prominent physicians say in an editorial of a medical journal that they edit that robotic surgery, fetal surgery and cord blood collection has no proven benefit because it costs too much for healthcare, I can't help but wonder what agenda they have going on. Read the blog post to learn more about this outrageous editorial.

$2.9 Million Settlement for Death of 6 Year Old While in MRI

In a horribly tragic case in Westchester, New York, a 6 year old boy was killed while undergoing an MRI in 2001. A technician had been walking by with an oxygen cannister that should never have been in the area because of the powerful magnet being used. The cannister became a missile and struck and killed the little boy.

Excessive Radiation Kills 2 New York Patients

Today, January 24, 2010, the New York Times exposes two severe instances of cancer patients in New York, who died not of their cancer, but of excessive radiation doses to TREAT their cancer. This is a moving video.

"Almost" Doesn't Count

I often get calls from potential clients telling me that because of some doctor's wrongdoing they "almost" died. Luckily for them, "almost" doesn't count. Some callers say they almost suffered permanent harm from carelessness of a doctor or nurse. Again, "almost" doesn't count.

Settlement Reached at Same Time as Jury Verdict-Result?

This medical malpractice case, tried in Kings County Supreme Court, also known as Brooklyn, NY had a bizarre twist. The case involved a man who underwent knee surgery and suffered permanent injury. The first trial resulted in a verdict of $1.5 million. After appeal, the case had to be re-tried. During the second trial, as the jury was deliberating, the parties agreed to settle the case for $150,000. The jury, almost simultaneously announced they had reached a verdict.

EMTs Accused of Ignoring Dying Woman Get Suspended, Investigated

Two New York Emergency Medical Technician's employed by the New York Fire Department were suspended yesterday for failing to help a pregnant woman after she had collapsed. Instead, according to reports, they directed people to call 911. How's that for cold comfort?

Both mother and baby died. Results of the autopsy are pending.
Read the article here at Gothamist for a chilling account of indifference by people who are paid to help injured victims.

"Please Take Over My Medical Malpractice Trial...NOW" pleads woman in middle of a trial

I received a call late tonight from a woman who was in the middle of a medical malpractice trial here in New York. She asked whether I would like to take over her case since she was unhappy with how her attorney was representing her. I told her that it would be impossible since the trial judge would not suspend her trial just to get a new attorney. Nor would the judge give her a 'do-over' because she didn't like the way the testimony was going in to the jury. The middle of a trial is not the time to realize that you don't like your attorney.

How to Ask Your Treating Doctor to Be Your Expert in Your Medical Malpractice Case

Learn why your treating doctor may be your best expert in a medical malpractice case.

How to Hire a New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer Without Paying a Dime (upfront)

You've suffered injury because of a doctor or hospital's wrongdoing. You need to find an attorney to help you with your legal problems. How much does a good lawyer cost? How much does he want to meet with him? Will he take my case if I don't have money to pay now? Read the article to learn the answers to these questions.

How to Start a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit in New York

Ever wonder how exactly a medical malpractice case gets started in New York? Reading this article will take you through the different steps an attorney needs to evaluate once you walk into their office. Take a look.

A Defense Attorney's Agenda

You have brought a lawsuit seeking compensation for the injuries you suffered at the hands of a doctor or hospital. Your goal, is to win your case and to obtain "Justice" for the  injury you suffered. Your attorney is known as a "plaintiff's attorney." His entire goal is to obtain compensation for your injuries. His success is directly linked to yours. Should he win your case or settle your case favorably, he stands to receive a portion of whatever is recovered, after his expenses.

Not many people outside of New York recognize that the lawyer's fee in medical malpractice cases in New York only starts at 30% and decreases by 5% as we go up in the amount we recover for you. To put it simply: 30% is the maximum fee allowed in New York.  As we go up incrementally, the attorney's fee goes down by 5%. This is known as a "sliding scale."

What does this have to do with a defense attorney's agenda? Everything.

A defense attorney's job is to defend the doctor or hospital as best he can. A defense lawyer gets paid by the doctor's insurance company. He gets paid an hourly fee for the work he performs. It is an unspoken fact that defense attorneys prefer to handle a case as long as possible before having to resolve it or go to trial. Why? The longer they handle a particular case, the more they are able to bill for the work they perform. There is no incentive for a defense attorney to resolve a case sooner rather than later.

Having said that, there are some excellent medical malpractice defense lawyers in New York who recognize troublesome cases at the beginning of a lawsuit. Those experienced trial lawyers will sometimes attempt to resolve a case in the early stages to save the insurance company money by having to pay extensive legal fees, a protracted trial and appeal.

Good defense attorneys who recognize they cannot defend a case will recommend to their insurance carrier that they should make an effort to resolve a case sooner rather than later. An early settlement can often save an insurance company a great deal of money by discounting the ultimate amount of compensation a victim receives years before the case goes to trial.

An experienced plaintiff's attorney recognizes the benefits of early settlement because it means that his client will receive a guaranteed amount of money years earlier, without the need to spend many thousands of dollars. Of course, along with that early settlement proposal, both sides recognize that they expect some type of discount for the benefit of settling early.

The defense attorney's only incentive to settle a case early and save the insurance company money is the knowledge that doing so may put him in good standing with the insurance company.  An attorney who saves an insurance company money is likely to benefit from additional cases that the insurance company  sends to them as a "reward" for saving money.

Conclusion:

When you wonder why your case is not settling early, keep in mind a defense attorney's hidden agenda and recognize that you may have to go to trial in order to prove your case. Your attorney should recognize this and be prepared to go the distance in every case.

Frivolous Lawsuits in New York City: Where Are They?

"Hey Sam, did you read about the lawsuit where the neurosurgeon operated on the wrong side of the patient's brain?"
"Yeah. I wonder how a brain surgeon could have made such a simple mistake?"

When was the last time that you actually read about a "FRIVOLOUS" lawsuit in the newspaper or one that was reported on TV? Sure there are some stupid lawsuits that should never have been brought; look at the Judge who sued his dry cleaner for thousands of dollars because the dry cleaner destroyed his pants.

But really. Think about the last time you heard about a frivolous medical malpractice case in New York. I haven't heard of one in a long time, and I've been in this business for over 21 years.

I know that when a doctor is sued for providing negligent care and being careless, 99 times out of a 100 they feel they did nothing wrong. Yet the injured victim has a totally different opinion. When you have two competing opinions, where each side has their own medical experts to support their position, if a jury ultimately sides with the doctor, does that mean that the patient's lawsuit was "Frivolous?"

If the patient wins, does that mean that the doctor should have never defended the lawsuit, since his defense was "Frivolous?"

Personally, I think this is semantics; a play on words. Each side can manipulate their viewpoint to show how the other side's position was "frivolous" at the end of the case. What does that mean for the argument for or against the way medical malpractice lawsuits are handled here in New York and throughout the country?

It means that you need to look at the fundamentals of why we, as citizens of this State and Country, are permitted to bring lawsuits. The reasoning even goes back to Talmudic (ancient biblical) times. If someone causes harm to another, they must pay. It's as simple as that. The payback includes actual costs; the cost to replace a destroyed item as well as the intangible cost- the suffering caused when the incident occurred.

Our common law adapted those basic fundamental rights, and gave citizens the absolute right to seek compensation in a Court of law. That rule of law applies to anyone in any State in the United States. If you are a company and a competitor stole your secrets; you have an absolute right to go to court and try to prove that you were wronged and seek compensation from the wrongdoer.

If you are in a business that makes T-shirts and you hired a vendor to supply you with special t-shirts and the vendor breached his contract and you lost hundreds of thousands of dollars; you have an absolute right to go into court claiming breach of contract and try to prove that you're entitled to be compensated for your business losses.

If those businesses lost their cases, for whatever reason, does that mean that they had "Frivolous" cases? If they won their cases, does that mean the people or companies that they sued had "Frivolous" defenses? You see the semantics and how this word "frivolous" has little meaning depending on who won or who lost?

The next time you read about "Frivolous" lawsuits here in New York or anywhere in our great United States of America ask yourself who is claiming the case was frivolous? The winner or loser? Then you'll have a better understanding of their agenda and why they want people to think cases are frivolous.

Thanks for taking the time to read my blog.

THE INSURANCE HOAX: HOW DOCTORS AND PATIENTS PAY FOR THE HUGE EARNINGS OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURERS

You think "Tort reform" is good for you and the economy? Think again.
You think altering the way injured victims are compensated helps lower health care costs? Think again.
You think that doctors' medical malpractice insurance companies don't make huge profits? Think again.

You've got to read this article from the American Association for Justice which describes in detail how insurance companies earn their money and what they do with it. Learn why crying "wolf" just doesn't cut it anymore. This is a must read.

Click here to read THE INSURANCE HOAX: HOW DOCTORS AND PATIENTS PAY FOR THE HUGE  EARNINGS OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURERS.

Moving The Malpractice Debate Beyond ‘Caps’

"Insurance expert says patient safety measures could reduce costs

Former University of Connecticut law professor Tom Baker recently moved to the University of Pennsylvania Law School and its prestigious Wharton School of Business to teach insurance.

While in Hartford, he rose to become a national expert on the impact of medical malpractice litigation on physicians’ insurance costs — and on the costs of health care generally. In recent interviews, he has maintained that the U.S. has long experienced an epidemic of medical malpractice, but is not in the grip of an epidemic of malpractice litigation."

Read the full article here.

Don't Believe The Hype: Medical Malpractice Tort Reform is Not What Americans Want

Philadelphia trial lawyer Maxwell Kennerly hits the nail on the head by scouring through the actual survey that was conducted that leads a reader to conclude that 83% of people surveyed want tort reform.

It's important that you read the actual question that people were asked in order to truly understand the fallacy behind the study and the conclusions the writers wants you to reach.

Good job Maxwell.

To read the full article, click here.

Botched Gallbladder Surgery

An out-of-work chef was told he needed his gallbladder taken out. It was going to be done laparoscopically. It was "routine." The healing time was minimal and there was no need for an extended hospital stay. The doctors call this procedure a 'laparoscopic cholescystectomy'.

Shortly after the surgery my client started having significant abdominal pain. Calls to the surgeon's office brushed off the his complaints as 'normal post-operative pain'. After two weeks of unremitting belly pain, the patient was told to go to the closest emergency room. An MRI and CT scan revealed the patient needed emergency surgery right away to explore what was going on in his belly.

After surgery at a different hospital, the surgeon told the patient that his common bile duct had been clipped off during the original surgery. As a result, bile continued to back up causing significant pain. During the emergency surgery, the patient required a 12 inch massive abdominal incision so the doctors could explore his entire belly. He also required drains for more than six months sticking out of his abdomen.

The common bile duct should never have been clippped off during the gallbladder removal. The fact that the surgeon failed to recognize it, is a departure from good medical practice. If he had recognized the misplacement during surgery, the clip could have been removed and properly placed.

This surgeon's carelessness resulted in significant pain and the need for emergency surgery for this patient and almost a year of recuperation. 

Pardon me, but I'm Not Walmart

I received a call at 7 AM this morning asking whether I was Walmart. I politely told the caller, after rubbing the sleep out of my eyes that she was calling an attorney's office and not Walmart. When I finally awoke, I questioned why this woman would think that I was Walmart. 

I don't have a big-box store-front office. I don't discount my fees. I don't offer sales on goods and services. I don't advertise on TV, and I don't have thousands of customers pouring in and out of my parking lot on a daily basis.

• As a solo practitioner, I have the benefit of knowing every detail of every case but I handle.
• As a solo practitioner, I don't have to ask three associates what was the last thing that happened on your case, when you call asking for information.
• As a solo practitioner, I have the privilege of meeting you at your very first office visit.
• I have the privilege of being with you when you are questioned at your question and answer session, known as a deposition. I also have the privilege of representing you at trial.

There are many large law firms in New York that are set up differently. The attorney you first meet with may not be the attorney who handles your deposition. The attorney you call to get an update may not be the same lawyer that you met on your first visit. The attorney who handles your deposition may not be the trial attorney who tries your case. There are some law firms that have attorneys dedicated to the pretrial phase of your case, and those lawyers do not try cases. Likewise, those law firms may have teams of dedicated trial lawyers, where all they do is try cases. 

I personally found, in almost 21 years in practice, that clients love continuity.

Clients like to know that if they have a question, they can go directly to their point person at the lawyer's office to ask them a question or address any concerns they have. No one likes to be shuffled around from one person to the next. However, the question I always ask is "Do you want to deal with the senior trial attorney from day one?" or "Do you want to go to a large firm with many attorneys to handle your case where you may not speak to the actual trial lawyer until shortly before trial?" The choice, as always is yours to make. Choose wisely.

Conclusion:

Am I Walmart? Clearly not. Obviously, she got the wrong number.

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE IN NEW YORK: 3 WAYS TO IMPROVE YOUR CHANCES OF BEING INVITED INTO AN ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

1. Be clear and concise when telling your lawyer what your legal problem is. 

There is nothing worse than having a potential client call and literally ramble endlessly without a defined purpose. I understand that when you make that big leap and call an attorney, you want to explain every detail that caused you to call an attorney. 

However, the purpose of talking to you on the phone is only to get a brief summary. I personally use the call as a screening tool to determine if your case is one that I’d be interested in looking into. I also use our call to find out what you think was done wrong that caused you permanent harm.

2. Be able to tell your lawyer what permanent injuries or disability you or your family member suffered as a result of wrongdoing.

Any attorney who handles medical malpractice cases in New York needs to know what injury or permanent disability you suffered. If you have no injury, or your injury is minor then most experienced attorneys in New York (myself included) would not accept such a case.

3. Have specific documents in one central place.

It helps greatly if you can locate and put into a folder documents such as health insurance explanation of benefits; marriage certificate; income tax records (if you are claiming lost earnings or lost future earnings); medicare or medicaid card, health insurance card; any medical records you may have; as well as a list of all doctors you have seen over the last 3 years.

CONCLUSION: 

By having this information when you call an attorney’s office you stand a much better chance of not only impressing the attorney with your knowledge, but being invited to meet with the attorney in person to evaluate your case.

5 THINGS A NY MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ATTORNEY LOOKS FOR WHEN YOU COME INTO THEIR OFFICE

Have you ever wondered how some cases are eagerly accepted by an attorney and others are not? What are the top five things an experienced attorney looks for when deciding whether to take a case?

DOES YOUR STORY SOUND BELIEVABLE?

If your story is not believable, an attorney will likely reject your case without ever doing an investigation. Why not? The moment you walk in the door, an attorney looks at you as if you are walking into court and taking the witness stand. He will look at your story from the viewpoint of a jury sitting and listening to your case to see if they will find it believable and is credible. If your story lacks credibility, no attorney will want to spend thousands and thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours prosecuting your case, knowing at the outset that the chance of you winning your case is minimal.

DOES WHAT YOU SAY MAKE SENSE?

This is commonly referred to as the ‘smell test’. What’s that? If it doesn’t smell right, then a jury will find it hard to believe your story. Again, if the attorney thinks a jury will not accept your story, then he likely will not take your case.

WHAT DO YOU THINK WAS DONE WRONG?

Every attorney who evaluates a medical malpractice case in New York wants to know what you think was done wrong. The injured victim or their family is usually a very good source of information when trying to find out what went wrong.

WHAT HARM DID THE WRONGDOING CAUSE?

The reason we need to know what injuries you suffered is because we are required to link the injuries with the wrongdoing in order to proceed forward with a valid case. This is known legally as ‘causation’. If there is a missing link, then it becomes impossible to prove a valid case. Keep in mind that in any evaluation of a medical malpractice case, the attorney MUST get a medical expert to review your records and confirm each element of your case.

What are those elements? Exactly what I talked about in paragraph 3 and 4. I must prove (1) wrongdoing; (2) that the wrongdoing caused harm; and (3) that the harm is significant and permanent.

DO I GET ALONG WITH YOU?

Believe it or not, your case will take approximately 2-3 years from start to finish. The attorney will need to determine whether you are a good fit and whether you will have a good relationship that you can both live with for the duration.

If you do not get along with each other, it’s probably not a good idea to stay together at the outset. The attorney-client relationship is an important one. If the fit is a good one, great. If it’s not, just as in a marriage, don’t get started.

CONCLUSION:

These five tips will help you understand what an attorney looks for when you walk in the door and they start asking you questions.

 

Cover-up at New York's municipal hospitals-NY Daily News Exposes Hospital Errors and Fraud

New York Daily News blows the lid on cover-ups at New York City municipal hospitals including Bellevue hospital, Coney Island hospital, Elmhurst hospital, Harlem hospital, Jacobi hospital, Kings County hospital, Lincoln hospital, Metropolitan hospital, North Central Bronx hospital, Queens General hospital and Woodhull hospital.

"City-run hospitals faked records and covered up dozens of botched operations, deadly accidents, malpractice and other medical screwups, a Daily News investigation has found.

The coverups hid a trail of human suffering among patients who were maimed and relatives who were never told the truth about how their loved ones died or were injured unnecessarily."

Read the full article here.