How Do You Choose a Medical Malpractice Lawyer in New York?

How do you decide which attorney is right for you? If you've never hired an attorney before, you won't know until you're in the thick of it. Here's information you need to know to make you a better informed consumer.

Filing Complaints against Hospitals: How to Be an Effective Advocate

Many hospitals consistently provide quality care to their patients, but there are always instances where certain individuals don’t receive the professional attention they deserve. This is to be expected in any business, but in hospitals, the consequences can be more serious and could lead to life-threatening situations. Hospitals also present more difficulty because patients are not always in a sufficiently stable mental or physical state to be their own care quality advocates. The following are steps to be taken by patients or their family members and should serve as a guide to proceeding through the proper channels to achieve fast and effective results.

Residents Performing Unsupervised Operations

What happens when doctors-in-training perform surgery unsupervised? Think it doesn't happen? Think again. As more hospitals cut back on expenses, training and personnel, who do you think suffers the most? The nurses? The technicians? The doctors? Wrong. The patient suffers. Read the article to learn why.

Gerry Oginski wins $1.5 Million Verdict in Podiatry Malpractice Case

On Friday, July 23, 2010, a Westchester County jury in the Supreme Court of the State of New York determined that my client, Annemarie Flannery was entitled to be compensated $1.5 million as compensation for injuries caused by a podiatrist during bunion surgery. Her husband, David Flannery was entitled to be compensated $50,000 for his lost services claim. The case involved a claim of a failure to properly perform foot surgery involving my client's bunion on her right foot. It was our claim that the podiatrist removed too much bone during the procedure, and improperly positioned the first metatarsal. As result, this changed the dynamic forces of her foot and forced her to bear most of her weight underneath the second and third metatarsals in her foot. We also claimed that the patient should have had her second and third metatarsals surgically shortened during her first bunion surgery. This would have prevented the problem from arising.

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE IN NEW YORK; FACTS AND TRENDS

FACT: Patients sue doctors and hospitals. They’re unhappy with the outcome of a procedure; they’re upset because a doctor misdiagnosed their condition and now they have a permanent injury or disability. That’s a fact. However, the facts and trends show an entirely different story. Fact: Most victims of medical malpractice in NY don’t even know they’ve been a victim of improper medical care because nobody tells them.

HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF A DOCTOR SAY "I'M NOT GOING TO ORDER A TEST OR PROCEDURE, BECAUSE IT COSTS TOO MUCH?

When two prominent physicians say in an editorial of a medical journal that they edit that robotic surgery, fetal surgery and cord blood collection has no proven benefit because it costs too much for healthcare, I can't help but wonder what agenda they have going on. Read the blog post to learn more about this outrageous editorial.

"Almost" Doesn't Count

I often get calls from potential clients telling me that because of some doctor's wrongdoing they "almost" died. Luckily for them, "almost" doesn't count. Some callers say they almost suffered permanent harm from carelessness of a doctor or nurse. Again, "almost" doesn't count.

Do New York Doctors Wake Up and Say "Who Can I Injure Today?"

With all the talk about health reform today, and proposed 'tort reform' by Republicans together with sensationalized lawsuits in the newspaper today, it's no wonder that many people think that they're "Entitled" to money just because they had a bad outcome. Our society is conditioned to think, rightfully so, that if they've been wronged, then they have a right to go to court and obtain compensation from the person or company that caused them harm.

A Defense Attorney's Agenda

You have brought a lawsuit seeking compensation for the injuries you suffered at the hands of a doctor or hospital. Your goal, is to win your case and to obtain "Justice" for the  injury you suffered. Your attorney is known as a "plaintiff's attorney." His entire goal is to obtain compensation for your injuries. His success is directly linked to yours. Should he win your case or settle your case favorably, he stands to receive a portion of whatever is recovered, after his expenses.

Not many people outside of New York recognize that the lawyer's fee in medical malpractice cases in New York only starts at 30% and decreases by 5% as we go up in the amount we recover for you. To put it simply: 30% is the maximum fee allowed in New York.  As we go up incrementally, the attorney's fee goes down by 5%. This is known as a "sliding scale."

What does this have to do with a defense attorney's agenda? Everything.

A defense attorney's job is to defend the doctor or hospital as best he can. A defense lawyer gets paid by the doctor's insurance company. He gets paid an hourly fee for the work he performs. It is an unspoken fact that defense attorneys prefer to handle a case as long as possible before having to resolve it or go to trial. Why? The longer they handle a particular case, the more they are able to bill for the work they perform. There is no incentive for a defense attorney to resolve a case sooner rather than later.

Having said that, there are some excellent medical malpractice defense lawyers in New York who recognize troublesome cases at the beginning of a lawsuit. Those experienced trial lawyers will sometimes attempt to resolve a case in the early stages to save the insurance company money by having to pay extensive legal fees, a protracted trial and appeal.

Good defense attorneys who recognize they cannot defend a case will recommend to their insurance carrier that they should make an effort to resolve a case sooner rather than later. An early settlement can often save an insurance company a great deal of money by discounting the ultimate amount of compensation a victim receives years before the case goes to trial.

An experienced plaintiff's attorney recognizes the benefits of early settlement because it means that his client will receive a guaranteed amount of money years earlier, without the need to spend many thousands of dollars. Of course, along with that early settlement proposal, both sides recognize that they expect some type of discount for the benefit of settling early.

The defense attorney's only incentive to settle a case early and save the insurance company money is the knowledge that doing so may put him in good standing with the insurance company.  An attorney who saves an insurance company money is likely to benefit from additional cases that the insurance company  sends to them as a "reward" for saving money.

Conclusion:

When you wonder why your case is not settling early, keep in mind a defense attorney's hidden agenda and recognize that you may have to go to trial in order to prove your case. Your attorney should recognize this and be prepared to go the distance in every case.

5 THINGS A NY MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ATTORNEY LOOKS FOR WHEN YOU COME INTO THEIR OFFICE

Have you ever wondered how some cases are eagerly accepted by an attorney and others are not? What are the top five things an experienced attorney looks for when deciding whether to take a case?

DOES YOUR STORY SOUND BELIEVABLE?

If your story is not believable, an attorney will likely reject your case without ever doing an investigation. Why not? The moment you walk in the door, an attorney looks at you as if you are walking into court and taking the witness stand. He will look at your story from the viewpoint of a jury sitting and listening to your case to see if they will find it believable and is credible. If your story lacks credibility, no attorney will want to spend thousands and thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours prosecuting your case, knowing at the outset that the chance of you winning your case is minimal.

DOES WHAT YOU SAY MAKE SENSE?

This is commonly referred to as the ‘smell test’. What’s that? If it doesn’t smell right, then a jury will find it hard to believe your story. Again, if the attorney thinks a jury will not accept your story, then he likely will not take your case.

WHAT DO YOU THINK WAS DONE WRONG?

Every attorney who evaluates a medical malpractice case in New York wants to know what you think was done wrong. The injured victim or their family is usually a very good source of information when trying to find out what went wrong.

WHAT HARM DID THE WRONGDOING CAUSE?

The reason we need to know what injuries you suffered is because we are required to link the injuries with the wrongdoing in order to proceed forward with a valid case. This is known legally as ‘causation’. If there is a missing link, then it becomes impossible to prove a valid case. Keep in mind that in any evaluation of a medical malpractice case, the attorney MUST get a medical expert to review your records and confirm each element of your case.

What are those elements? Exactly what I talked about in paragraph 3 and 4. I must prove (1) wrongdoing; (2) that the wrongdoing caused harm; and (3) that the harm is significant and permanent.

DO I GET ALONG WITH YOU?

Believe it or not, your case will take approximately 2-3 years from start to finish. The attorney will need to determine whether you are a good fit and whether you will have a good relationship that you can both live with for the duration.

If you do not get along with each other, it’s probably not a good idea to stay together at the outset. The attorney-client relationship is an important one. If the fit is a good one, great. If it’s not, just as in a marriage, don’t get started.

CONCLUSION:

These five tips will help you understand what an attorney looks for when you walk in the door and they start asking you questions.

 

Cover-up at New York's municipal hospitals-NY Daily News Exposes Hospital Errors and Fraud

New York Daily News blows the lid on cover-ups at New York City municipal hospitals including Bellevue hospital, Coney Island hospital, Elmhurst hospital, Harlem hospital, Jacobi hospital, Kings County hospital, Lincoln hospital, Metropolitan hospital, North Central Bronx hospital, Queens General hospital and Woodhull hospital.

"City-run hospitals faked records and covered up dozens of botched operations, deadly accidents, malpractice and other medical screwups, a Daily News investigation has found.

The coverups hid a trail of human suffering among patients who were maimed and relatives who were never told the truth about how their loved ones died or were injured unnecessarily."

Read the full article here. 

Enclosed Is Your Check For $1 Million Dollars

Here's a letter I received:

"Dear Mr. Oginski, 

Enclosed is your check for $1,000,000. This represents the full and final settlement of this action."

Looking at this remarkable check, I couldn't help but think how useful this will be for my client who suffered permanent and irreversible injury due to medical wrongdoing. So often we read about injured victims who abuse the legal process for their own financial gain, as well as lawyers looking to make a quick buck at the expense of their clients. However, little is written about the seriously injured victim who goes quietly into the night after settling their case with a "no publicity" clause.

In New York, many insurance companies demand that the attorney and injured victim agree not to publicize the terms of the settlement. The injured victim is often left without much choice should they wish to settle their case for the number being offered by the insurance company. Obviously, if the settlement offer is unacceptable and the case goes to a verdict, the winner is free to publicize that verdict in any way they choose.

There are some people who think that a $1 million settlement is a windfall. There are others who look at it as a winning lottery ticket. Yet there are similarly injured victims who look at it as insufficient compensation for the horrible and irreversible injuries this person suffered through no fault of their own.

So, when I saw the check addressed to my client and my law firm telling me "Here's your $1 million dollar settlement, I couldn't help but think about the injuries, the suffering, and the turmoil my client endured to justify obtaining a $1 million settlement on his case.

Failure to Recognize Nerve Injury Results in $1 Million Settlement

The failure to recognize that a nerve was being compressed, despite the patient complaining about symptoms of pain, numbness and tingling were ignored during a busy emergency room shift. The failure to perform surgery in a timely manner resulted in permanent damage to the nerve, the arm and hand. This case was settled during discovery and shortly before it was placed on the trial calendar.

New York Medical Malpractice-Your Doctor Was Sued. Is He Still a Good Doctor?

You just found out that your treating doctor was sued for medical malpractice. You do not know the details, nor do you know what injuries the patient claimed as a result of the alleged malpractice. Does the fact that your doctor was sued mean that he or she is not a good doctor? The short answer is "No," and here's why.

In this great Country we live in, an injured victim has a legal right to seek compensation from those people he believes caused him physical and emotional harm. This is true in New York as well. Our civil justice system is set up so that if you choose to bring a lawsuit against a doctor or hospital, then the "burden" of proving your case is on the person bringing the lawsuit. "That seems fair, right?"

In New York, an injured victim must show to a jury that what he is alleging is more likely right than wrong. In other words, he is not required to prove to a panel of 6 jurors that what he is saying is 100% absolutely true. Instead, he is only required to show that his version of his claim is "more likely true than not true." "But what if a juror just isn't sure about the injured victim's claim? What happens then?"

The answer is that a juror does not have to be absolutely sure. Instead, the juror just needs to determine whether what the plaintiff (the injured person bringing the lawsuit) is saying is more likely true than not true. If it is, then the jury is required to render a decision in favor of the plaintiff. During jury selection, a good trial lawyer may tell prospective jurors that "Dr. Jones is a good doctor and we are not here to dispute that. However, at a particular time, and at a particular place, this doctor was careless and that carelessness caused my client injury. When a doctor was careless, we expect that person to take responsibility for their actions."

To answer the question posed in the title of this article- just because a doctor is sued for malpractice does not mean that he is a bad doctor. This is especially true if the case has not finished and is still in litigation.

Most patients will not know what the facts of the case are. They will not know what the doctor's defenses are. Nor will they likely know the patient's injuries and whether that patient is permanently disabled. For all you know, the case may not have merit. On the other hand, it may.

The bottom line: Don't judge a person by accusations you may have overhead somewhere else. Wait for the outcome. Learn the details. If you are truly concerned, be straightforward with your doctor. Ask him directly. Ask for reassurance. The answer will help you make an informed decision about whether to continue your medical care with this doctor.

2 Questions Every New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer Needs To Ask?

Many calls I receive are from potential clients who want to know if they have a valid medical malpractice case. These callers want to tell me their story, but sometimes the story rambles on and on. I can't follow the timeline, and I can't determine why this person is calling, and cannot tell what injury they're calling about. As politely as possible I tell them to stop and list to this two-part question:

"What do you think was done wrong that caused you permanent harm?"

That question usually stops most callers cold. They pause to think about the permanent injury they may have suffered.

Most callers have no problem explaining how they feel a doctor or hospital did something wrong. However, when asked to link the wrongdoing to the permanent injury, many callers simply get stumped, finally recognizing that they may not have a potential case here in the State of New York.

The two-part question listed above has, contained within it, three elements needed to prove a successful case. In every medical malpractice case in New York I must be able to prove that
1. There was wrongdoing,
2. The wrongdoing caused injury, and
3. The injury is significant and permanent.

Lots of callers can talk at length about elements number one and two, but when they think about the permanent injuries, many realize that they simply don't have any long-term permanent injury. It is also important for any lawyer to speak to, to inform you that in New York, all three of the elements needed to prove a malpractice case must be confirmed by a medical expert who has either treated you, or reviewed all of your medical records. If any one of those elements is missing, then there's no way to prove your case.

NY Medical Malpractice - 2 Reasons Why Victims Won't Recover Any Money

Even though there are still calls for "Tort Reform" the vast majority of malpractice victims in New York fail to recognize that they are a victim of medical neglect.

1. Patients don't know they are victims of medical malpractice.

Studies show that roughly 2.9 to 3.7 percent of admitted hospital patients suffer some sort of preventable injury as a result of improper medical care. Even more management-related injuries occur outside of the hospital. These injuries are a result of a physician's affirmative mistake, or that person's failure to act. Types of mistakes include errors in diagnosis, use of automated materials, and inappropriate delay of treatment.

However, one of the most common errors occurs with administering medication. Up to 98,000 patients are killed each year as a result of preventable medical errors, the eighth leading cause of death in the U.S., yet only 10,000 cases of malpractice are filed each year. In the vast majority of cases, however, the fact that a poor medical outcome was caused by malpractice is hidden from the patient.

2. No autopsy was ever performed.

Remember that we must prove both carelessness on the part of the doctor or hospital and that the carelessness resulted in death or injury. In a medical malpractice case that results in death, it is extremely difficult to prove that the death occurred because of the malpractice without an autopsy. This is because there are so many reasons why a person might have died, but we must prove that at least one of the reasons for the death was the negligence or carelessness of the doctor or hospital.

NY Medical Malpractice -Does Obnoxious Doctor or Small Injury=Compensation For Victim?

1. A physician's poor bedside manner does not constitute negligence.

In the vast majority of cases, even extremely poor bedside manner cannot be considered in determining whether a physician was legally negligent in providing treatment. We have reviewed many cases where arrogant doctors provided care and the patient was injured. It just doesn't matter legally that the doctor was a jerk. We must prove, with expert medical opinion that the treatment departed from good and accepted medical care; that such care was a substantial factor in causing injury and that the injury is significant and permanent. Bedside manners are not, in and of itself, part of the formula that a jury will use to establish responsibility. 

2. The patient suffered no significant damages.

If the victim suffered minor injuries, the legal system is not set up to handle small medical malpractice cases. We decline hundreds of cases a year where it appears that the doctor was careless but the resulting injury was not significant. A pharmacist may incorrectly fill your prescription, and you might get sick for a few days. If you have a good recovery, however, you probably don't have the basis for a case. That's because the costs of pursuing the case will be greater than the expected recovery. Our Court system may not be perfect, but it does act as a filter to keep out all but the most serious cases of medical malpractice.

NY Medical Malpractice -3 Reasons Your Case Will Not Be Accepted

The physician or hospital's mismanagement did not necessarily cause the injury suffered.

When proving that medical malpractice was the reason why the patient suffered an injury, I must show that the treatment rendered or not rendered was a departure from good medical care. That medical neglect had to have been a cause of an injury, and the injury has to be significant and/or permanent. The attorneys for the doctors and hospital have many standard defenses such as: (1) The injury was an unforeseeable consequence of the initial condition/injury, (2) The injury was due to the patient's non-compliance with prior medical advice, (3) The risk of the patient's particular injury was a known, recognized, risk (acceptable to whom?), (4) Some other party was responsible for causing the injury, or (5) The injury was caused by a previous illness or disease.

Medical malpractice claims must show that the doctor's substandard care, more likely than not, was a substantial factor in causing injury.

The injured patient has not retained an experienced attorney.

The world of medical malpractice claims is a world unto its' own. It has its' own special rules and laws. We believe that it is imperative that an experienced medical malpractice attorney or an attorney that is 'teaming up with' an experienced malpractice attorney represent you.

The statute of limitations has expired.

This is the time a person has to start a lawsuit. The time limit is very different for a city, state or municipal hospital than it is for a private hospital or doctor. One reason that you should consult an experienced medical malpractice attorney early is to determine when the statute of limitations expires in your case! DON'T LET YOUR TIME RUN OUT without knowing your legal options!

Surgical Errors in New York

A surgical error can range from an improper procedure to an unrecognized perforation in an intestine leading to injury and death. How do you know whether a surgical error rises to the level of a departure from good and accepted practice? By having either a treating physician tell you that the treatment was improper, or having a medical expert confirm that there was improper medical care.

In New York, before an attorney is permitted to bring a medical malpractice lawsuit on behalf of an injured victim, he must have the case reviewed by a medical expert who is qualified in that field of medicine. The expert must be able to confirm that there was improper medical care; that the improper treatment caused harm, and that the harm is significant and permanent.

If any one of those elements is missing, then it will be difficult, if not impossible to bring a successful case. If the expert confirms there is a valid case, then your attorney must submit a "Certificate of Merit" which lets the Court know that you have had an expert review and confirm there is a basis for a case.

If you have questions about the care and treatment you received, and believe there was wrongdoing that cause you permanent harm, then call Gerry today to answer your legal questions at 516-487-8207. He welcomes your call. 

Sun Goes Down, Birthing Risks Go Up

When a woman goes into labor is hardly something that can be controlled. Often it happens at the most inopportune time. We have all heard at least one story of a pregnant woman traversing a snowstorm, hailing a cab, or rushing to the hospital in the middle of the night. As much as the timing of going into labor can catch a mother to be with her guard down, it can also catch hospital staff when it is down. A recent study of 700,000 births indicates that complications are much more likely at night then during the day.

Norwich, CT Obstetrician Sued for Baby's Death

When delivery goes wrong, it can go really wrong. Medical errors and mistakes can have deadly consequences. Find out what the allegations are in this Connecticut case involving claims of pain and suffering and wrongful death of a baby.

Failure to Diagnose Aneurysm

What is an aneurysm? How does someone fail to diagnose an aneurysm? What are the ramifications of missing a bleeding or rupturing aneurysm? Read the blog post to find out.

Scanning the Dangers of MRI’s

Gadolinium Based Contrast Agents Cause NSF Doctors routinely make difficult decisions as to what drugs and substances to give patients and in what circumstances. Patients rely on their doctors to make safe decisions on their behalf. That is why patients become upset when doctors administer substances to patients after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identifies such substance as harboring potential health hazards.

Kidney Cancer-Losing a case you should have won

There are few things more frustrating to a trial attorney than losing a case he should have won. Obviously, there are never any guarantees when taking a case to trial. However, in the recent case involving a failure to timely diagnose kidney cancer resulting in death of a 60-year-old man in Queens County this is exactly what happened. Mr. Liew needed a kidney transplant. The kidney he received had unknowingly had cancer.

Spinal Injection Causes Paralysis

One of the few comforts that a patient can rely on when undergoing a major procedure is that they usually get to meet and talk to the doctor who will be performing their operation. When that trust is betrayed, patients have a right to be upset. For example, a man was admitted to a hospital to receive an acrylic injection to his spinal column. The procedure was supposed to help the man with his back pain. The man decided to undergo the procedure after discussing the risks with his doctor. After the procedure, the patient was paralyzed. Apparently the injection was performed incorrectly and the inserted fluid spread to inappropriate parts of the spine. Additionally, the patient found out that the doctor who performed the operation was not the one that he consulted with.