I received a call late tonight from a woman who was in the middle of a medical malpractice trial here in New York. She asked whether I would like to take over her case since she was unhappy with how her attorney was representing her.
I told her that it would be impossible since the trial judge would not suspend her trial just to get a new attorney. Nor would the judge give her a 'do-over' because she didn't like the way the testimony was going in to the jury. The middle of a trial is not the time to realize that you don't like your attorney.
My client was out riding his bicycle on a beautiful sunny Spring day this year, on a quiet stretch of road in Queens. He was approaching an intersection where cars were coming off of the Grand Central Parkway exit ramp. As a driver coming from the Grand Central heads down the exit ramp, he is left with one of two choices as he approaches the T intersection: Either turn left, or turn right. If you are going to make a left turn, you must get into the left-hand turning lane. There is a stop sign at that T intersection for cars just getting off the GCP exit. In this case, a driver coming off the Grand Central Parkway exit ramp got into the left-hand turning lane and proceeded to stop at the Stop sign. A good thing he did.
However, instead of looking to his left, which is where he was intending to turn, to check for oncoming traffic, he looked to his right and removed his foot from the brake and applied the gas. As he did so, he proceeded to hit my bike-riding client-who by the way was in the middle of the intersection, on the right side of his body, throwing him to the pavement. A trip to the emergency room revealed a fractured finger, that days later required surgery to correct. An MRI of the knee revealed damage to a tendon, which required arthroscopic surgery to fix.
In addition, my client suffered a significant shoulder injury requiring extensive physical therapy. This young man, who was wearing his helmet at the time of impact, was a computer programmer and because of the injury to his finger and surgery, had great difficulty typing and performing his job duties. Recuperation and physical therapy has helped him regain function to his finger and hand, and he performs strengthening exercises each day.
This accident was preventable. The careless and negligent driver had only to look to his left to see what he should have seen. Had he merely looked to his left, he would have seen my client riding his bike peacefully on a beautiful Saturday morning. Instead, through the negligence of this driver, my client's day was turned upside down.
Not a day goes by without getting a call from a disgruntled client asking if I would be willing to take over their case from another attorney.
One of the first questions I ask this person is "Why do you want to switch attorneys?"
The response is usually one of two possible reasons:
1. The original lawyer has withdrawn from their case or
2. The client is unhappy with what the lawyer is doing, or in some cases, not doing.
When a lawyer withdraws from a case in New York, he must get permission from the Court to withdraw as the attorney. The Court will then give the client ample time in which to try and find another attorney to continue the case.
Clients may not realize it, but when an attorney withdraws from a medical malpractice or a negligence case, the defense knows that there must be some problem either with the merits of the case, or a conflict between the attorney and client that cannot be resolved. In either situation, it sheds a cloud over the case. A new attorney taking over the case has many intangible obstacles to overcome.
Just this week a potential client asked me to take over her case telling me that she had an "excellent case." Her attorney had withdrawn and now she had all the records to give to the next attorney.
When I asked why he withdrew, the response was "Well...he and I didn't get along."
"He didn't want to do what I asked him to do..."
"He wasn't really doing anything on my case..."
I informed this woman that it is my policy that I do not take over a case when another attorney has withdrawn. I do not need to inherit a whole host of someone else's problems. Her response was "There are no problems with my case. Only with my attorney."
What type of client do you think this person would be?
When the client is unhappy with what the lawyer is doing, it's usually because there is a lack of communication. I will always suggest that the client sit down with their attorney and have a straight-forward conversation about their concerns. An open line of communication with the attorney is vital. Stay in the loop, keep informed, and ask your attorney for regular updates.
I was asked this question today by a very educated man. He knew someone who had walked into a store, gotten hurt while taking something off a shelf, and assumed that the store was totally responsible for the other man's injuries.
I asked "Did the store know about the dangerous condition before this man pulled the object off a shelf?" "Why is that important?" asked this intelligent young man.
It's important because in the legal world, in New York, I must be able to prove that the store had "Notice" about a dangerous condition and that the store failed to time act to correct the problem before someone got hurt. This man felt strongly that the store should be held accountable for any injury or accident that takes place within its' premises. An encouraging thought for an injured victim, however, that is not what the law says.
In order to hold a store responsible for an accident that causes injury in New York, the employees of the store had to know about the dangerous condition and fail to timely fix the problem. If the people who worked in the store did not know about a dangerous problem, how then can they be held accountable for any injuries that happen while in the store?
There is another instance where a store will be found responsible for injuries arising out of an accident. Let's say that a dangerous condition existed for a lengthy period of time, so that "everybody" who went by that area of the store knew there was a problem, yet nobody fixed it.
Where the defect is present for such a long period of time, the law says that the store, or its' employees are deemed to have "Constructive Notice" of the defect, and they should have fixed it long ago.
Here's a good example: You're in the produce section of your supermarket. A shopper immediately in front of you accidentally drops a few grapes, and seconds later you step on it. You fall and fracture your leg. Is the store responsible? In New York, the answer likely is no. Why not? Because the people who worked in the store didn't know, and didn't have enough time to know of the dangerous condition. Therefore, there was no way they could have cleaned up the grapes before the accident happened.
Ok, here's another example: What if a shopper accidentally knocks a jar of tomato sauce to the ground, causing the jar to shatter and tomato sauce to splatter all over the aisle. Suppose that ten shoppers reported the damaged jar with sauce on the floor, and after ten minutes nobody has cleaned up the mess. Along comes some oblivious shopper, mindful of only herself and her grocery list.
You know what's going to happen, right? She slips, falls, and fractures her hip. Is the store responsible? As long as we could prove that the store had a policy of cleaning up their messes within minutes of being notified, then a gap of ten minutes without a clean-up might be construed as showing they had sufficient time to clean up the problem and failed to do so.
The bottom line is that when an accident happens in a store, you must notify the management immediately; have them complete a written report, and you should immediately go to the hospital for treatment if needed.
The brain is a complex and vital organ that shapes who we are. It allows us to understand questions and solve intricate problems, it produces our emotions while crafting our personality, and it helps us to live on both a biological and spiritual level. If it should experience damage than the essence of who we are could be lost forever. This is why traumatic brain injuries can cause grave damage to the life of its victim.
You suffered a terrible accident. You have been in the hospital for weeks now. Your family is angry that you are now physically disabled. You wonder when, if ever, you'll be able to return to work. Physical therapy is not helping much. Your treating doctors are not that encouraging. You fall into a state of despair.
You know you want to sue the driver of the car that hit you and caused all these ailments, but you do not know a New York accident attorney. Nor do you have any friends who know a good attorney they could recommend.
In this 12 page newsletter you'll learn about Gerry's new book, "Doctors Gone Wild." Learn how medicare and medicaid can ruin your accident lawsuit. Find out how Twitter and Facebook led to mistrials in recent lawsuits. Read about a juror in New York who was Twittering during the jury selection process. Learn why a permanent nerve injury resulted in a $1 Million Dollar settlement. Test your knowledge of medical malpractice and negligence cases in NY; Try our trivia game, and see what sits on top of the St. Maarten Courthouse.