You just found out that your treating doctor was sued for medical malpractice. You do not know the details, nor do you know what injuries the patient claimed as a result of the alleged malpractice. Does the fact that your doctor was sued mean that he or she is not a good doctor? The short answer is "No," and here's why.
In this great Country we live in, an injured victim has a legal right to seek compensation from those people he believes caused him physical and emotional harm. This is true in New York as well. Our civil justice system is set up so that if you choose to bring a lawsuit against a doctor or hospital, then the "burden" of proving your case is on the person bringing the lawsuit. "That seems fair, right?"
In New York, an injured victim must show to a jury that what he is alleging is more likely right than wrong. In other words, he is not required to prove to a panel of 6 jurors that what he is saying is 100% absolutely true. Instead, he is only required to show that his version of his claim is "more likely true than not true." "But what if a juror just isn't sure about the injured victim's claim? What happens then?"
The answer is that a juror does not have to be absolutely sure. Instead, the juror just needs to determine whether what the plaintiff (the injured person bringing the lawsuit) is saying is more likely true than not true. If it is, then the jury is required to render a decision in favor of the plaintiff. During jury selection, a good trial lawyer may tell prospective jurors that "Dr. Jones is a good doctor and we are not here to dispute that. However, at a particular time, and at a particular place, this doctor was careless and that carelessness caused my client injury. When a doctor was careless, we expect that person to take responsibility for their actions."
To answer the question posed in the title of this article- just because a doctor is sued for malpractice does not mean that he is a bad doctor. This is especially true if the case has not finished and is still in litigation.
Most patients will not know what the facts of the case are. They will not know what the doctor's defenses are. Nor will they likely know the patient's injuries and whether that patient is permanently disabled. For all you know, the case may not have merit. On the other hand, it may.
The bottom line: Don't judge a person by accusations you may have overhead somewhere else. Wait for the outcome. Learn the details. If you are truly concerned, be straightforward with your doctor. Ask him directly. Ask for reassurance. The answer will help you make an informed decision about whether to continue your medical care with this doctor.
