You are under the care of a doctor who prescribes you medication.
You then go to another physician for different problem and he wants to know what medications you are taking.
There's a key reason for him to know what medications you are currently on.
He needs to know that in order to make sure any treatment or medication he provides does not conflict with the medications you are currently taking.
He needs to know if there is any interaction between the medication he is prescribing and the one that you are currently on.
Let me show you what happened in a medical malpractice case I handled involving a patient's treating physician who had absolutely no idea what two medications the patient was taking or why.
This was remarkable.
My client believed that her doctor was careless at a particular time on a particular day.
She believed that his carelessness was a cause of her injuries.
She believed that those injuries were significant and permanent.
He confirmed that my client's treating doctor violated the basic standards of medical care causing her significant injury.
That allowed us to go ahead and start a lawsuit on her behalf.
During the course of her lawsuit I had an opportunity to question the doctor whom she sued.
This is known as pretrial testimony.
It's also called a deposition.
It's sworn testimony.
Except there is no judge present and there is no jury present.
This question and answer session takes place in the defense lawyer's office.
There is a court stenographer present to record all of my questions and all of the doctor's answers.
Those questions and answers then get transcribed into a booklet known as a transcript.
As part of my questioning, I will ask the doctor to read his notes into the record.
This helps tremendously, especially if the doctor's notes are handwritten.
I will then ask him to explain what those entries mean and why he did what he did.
In this case, on the patient's very first visit, the doctor took a detailed history from the patient.
I asked him to explain the patient's history.
Yet when I asked him about the two medications the patient was taking, according to his notes, he had no idea.
He had no idea what these medications were for.
He failed to ask the patient the dosages that she was taking.
He failed to ask the patient why she was on these medications.
I asked him whether it was important for him to know and understand what medications the patient was on.
I asked him why.
He said it's important to know if there are any drug interactions between what she is currently taking and what he may prescribe for her.
On that first office visit, he did prescribe her medication.
I asked him how he knew whether the medication he prescribed was contraindicated in light of the medication she was already taking.
I asked him whether it would be appropriate for a physician to prescribe medication to a patient without knowing or understanding what medications she was currently on.
He said "No, it wouldn't."
I asked him why would he botherd to ask what medications she was taking if he didn't factor that in when taking a new medication.
His answer was pathetic and obvious.
I then asked "If you're not going to use that information to help you decide which medication the patient should be on, why bother asking the question in the first place?"
"It would be important to know to make sure there's no bad drug interactions."
He also admitted that it's a relatively simple matter to look up on the computer or his phone what those medications were for.
This doctor could not explain why he failed to do this.
He also agreed that it would be violation from good and accepted medical care to prescribe medication for patient without knowing whether it would interact with her current medications.